05 January, 2017

Discomfort is our frenemy!


"The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way.", Marcus Aurelius

We'd all like to think we are rational beings first, but the reality is we're emotional first and logical second.  I remember the first became conscious of this - it was when an ABC radio program was talking about the "debt-snowball method" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-snowball_method).  Logically it makes sense to pay down the debt with the highest interest rate, but this method does something different - it targets the smallest debt first.

The key point the proponent of the debt-snowball method was making was that attempting the logical thing was (emotionally) overwhelming to his clients and, when overwhelmed, they would often make their situation worse! 

Gambling is particularly insidious for people in a debt crisis as each little "win" gives them the illusion of progress, when the reality is the system is engineered for them to (on average) lose.

I've seen this emotional overwhelm also happen in the work environment.  When I worked at EDS, I saw onboarded teams transform from "poor" to "great" just by providing them a way to transfer or escalate risks and issues to someone who could and would help.  I've seen this with my teams as well - a few small wins can make a huge transformational change in confidence and achievements.


It was only when my neighbour, an awesome therapist who often works with veterans who suffer from PTSD, recently introduced me to the concept of the "window of tolerance" that I finally grokked (got the gestalt of) what underpins the debt-snowball method.  This concept says that development, or change, can only occur in the emotional "goldilocks" zone of discomfort: neither relaxed or overwhelmed.  It necessarily also needs structure. 


Key symptoms of emotional overwhelm - individually and organizationally - are described beautifully in Carol Dweck's book, "Mindset" and Stephen Covey's book, "7 Habits..".  The two key mind-set dimensions I use are:
  • Internal: fixed versus growth mind-sets;
  • External: scarcity versus abundance mind-sets. 
The book, Mindset, describes how this manifests individually and I've also seen this manifest at scale in the workplace.  I've been in an environment where "manage by story" trumped "manage by evidence" and it isn't fun; the only people who thrived in these conditions were comforters (schmoozers) and blamers (snipers). 

Once you know you are outside the zone of tolerance (personally or professionally) how do you solve this? An answer to this is in a surprising place - Toastmasters.  Their process is often unspoken and fiendishly simple:
  • Find a friendly audience (or coach) that will help you stay in the "zone" through:
    • Emotional support (prefer shared experience) and encouragement.
    • Feedback delivered in an emotionally effective way.
  • Find a structured approach to the technical aspect of what you are trying to learn or achieve
    • Learn a small technique (see the debt-snowball method)
    • Practice the technique by taking risks that keep you in and help you expand the "goldilocks" zone of discomfort.
    • Slowly add to your technique library and practice until you reach the desired level.
  • Avoid the siren's call of "false comforts"
    • Fixed mind-set!  Especially the avoidance or rejection of discomfort
    • Superstitious thinking - always validate with evidence.  Accept not knowing.

For me this framework has completely revolutionized how I deal with my discomfort - it is now something to be mindfully optimized!  There are a couple of key caveats to this:
  • Choosing what domain to optimize discomfort in is just as important as what you decide not to - be true to your calling, purpose or mission.
  • The training principle of periodization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_periodization), or advancement by oscillation, applies - rest is just as important as action.  The pomedoro technique is a good example of this.
  • These optimizations are domain specific but they do (consciously and unconsciously) transfer between domains.

I'd recommend anyone starting this practice begin with physical exercise for two main reasons: it is relatively simple to measure discomfort (heart rate), measure progress (duration) and has a host of secondary benefits.  Read the book "Spark: the revolutionary new science of exercise and the brain" by Ratey and Hagerman for more detailed information. 

The approach for an organization is different in that instead of finding a supportive audience, it is leadership's role to create that supportive environment for the culture.  It is important to note that a culture that is in overwhelm (technical or emotional) will fight change much, much more than a normal organisation.



Notes:



I believe this is one of the key attributes of emotional maturity - learning to regulate and articulate our discomfort.


Value versus completeness

A while back, one of the sales guys I know intentionally left his job without a new one to go to.  I was surprised at how they were quietly confident that they could land their next gig without any problem - they have lots of practice selling themselves and their products/services.  This is in stark contrast to my technical colleagues who would be freaking out in this situation.  This made me stop and think - what is different given both technical and sales deliver value?  I put it down to how we measure our successes.

Completeness as the measure


I believe technical people usually measure their success by their completeness (breadth/depth/accuracy).  And when I consider my education it was all about being able to prove or demonstrate that I "knew" my material and could apply it across various situations.  Correctness - within a "black box" - was the measure of success.  And let me be clear, correctness is important; we don't want bridges falling down!  Success was a finished product within time, budget and quality constraints.  The why and the value people might get from that product was (understandably) not covered.

Value as the measure


From what I can see of my current gig in technical sales, it is all about value; the value of what you offer, matching that offering to a need (fitness) and finally realising that value (execution).  Identification of your value and their need is just as important as being able to communicate or articulate it in a way that can be consumed.  The measure of success is much simpler; a successful transaction.

Perception and Paradigm


I never realised how skewed my perception was to completeness and how at odds it is with the way the world works.  Looking at nature I see that nothing is immortal (complete), yet everything still thrives in messy imperfection.  In fact, it is that imperfection that can lead to new and wonderful things; incomplete and imperfect is paradoxically the heart of innovation.  Innovation through short iterations ensure that the right value is added (and removed) to be "fit" within an ever changing environment.

Challenge



My challenge is to not fuss about completeness or perfection and focus more on identifying, articulating and delivering value.

A personal philosophy

I have challenged myself to write out my personal philosophy as it is and as it evolves.  I've archived my old posts to focus on this.

Welcome to the adventure...